Sold the 4000 GNVC, as planned yesterday, and at $2.88. It is higher today, and it killed me to do it, but I really do want stocks that can have calls sold against them, in the Port. I mostly want to make money here, so if I see something enticing enough, I will buy non-optionable stocks, but the ground rules are there for a reason!
I looked at the other holdings of the Port this morning and nothing appeals to me in terms of selling calls. I have a bunch of cash, and Oncothyreon (ONTY) happens to be a watchlist stock that had bad news this morning. I bought 3,000 shares at $3.41 (and 1k in my real-world IRA at $3.45, earlier) - I'll let the share price shake out a little and then sell calls against them.
So now the Port is comprised of
2000 AOB
2000 NBIX
1600 ELN
400 DNDN
4900 ARNA
2500 SGMO
1000 MELA
200 AMAG
1500 ALTH
3000 ONTY
with $21,585 of cash.
I'm at a 30.8% return in nearly two years, a 16.6% annualized rate. The S&P 500 over that time has returned -7.3% and the Nasdaq has returned 9.3%.
Regards,
Trond
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Port update - options expiration
Quick summary of the Port, along with GenVec update:
On Friday, the Port had all 2000 ProGenics (PGNX) called away at $5, and the Elan calls expired worthless, allowing me to keep the premium and the shares. We're back to above 17% annualized return, still well shy of the 24 I am aiming for. I still feel it is doable, if I just put some time back into this Port. I have only been selling calls on 1 to 3 holdings a month, where I should be turning 100% of the holdings. I'll be selling the Genvec this coming week, since it does not offer options and I'm up over 10% already, having been in it for only a month. Time to take that profit and buy something I can sell calls against!
GenVec should be announcing the interim PACT trial results within 4 weeks now. On January 15th they said 10 to 12 weeks, and Friday 3/19/10 was exactly 9 weeks. While they may announce this coming week, both their annual earnings call and the recent Roth presentation suggested it could spill over into April so I would put more faith into it happening right around the first week of April.
In my real money IRA, I have an insane amount tied up in both Dendreon and Genvec - something like 85% of the total value. It has served me well, as the majority of Dendreon was bought under $6 (now $35) and my Genvec average basis is around $1.25 (now $2.80). I am however, finally at the point where I'll be selling at least a third of my GNVC over the next week or so, and may even dent my DNDN by 10% or so. I am far more confident that Dendreon will get approval, but at this price (mid 30s) I just do not see the return that I saw at the mid $20s we were at only a couple months ago. Genvec, at a little below $3, is also a MUCH different creature risk/return wise, than it was at the $0.77 I started buying at. The upcoming data release is a short term make-or-break event; it could go down (I honestly don't see it going below $1.50) on so-so data, but it could spike as much as another $7-10 on statistically significant data. There is a "reasonable" chance of stat-sig results - say 20-30% - but I am not risking 40+% of my net worth on a 20-30% chance of a home run. Please note that everyone's personal sense of risk vs. reward is vastly different - I AM in effect saying I'm okay with risking ~25% of my net worth!
This is because I already have a two bagger on Genvec - the most likely worse case scenario brings me back to a only slight average gain. I contrast this to the results, if excellent, and it makes sense for me to hold about 2/3 of what I have now, through the data release. For someone buying in now, it would be a greatly different risk/reward calculation.
Please also note that IF GenVec does drop, it very likely could be because the market is disappointed in the data not being excellent, and NOT because the data is bad. At the 92nd event - the first interim look) the hazard ratio was already .753 - the lower from 1.0 the better. This would have been a very good result, but investors were spooked because at 24 months, there was no apparent drug benefit. Missed was the fact that only three patients were still alive and uncensored, and one of those was in the placebo arm. Thus the placebo curve matched the drug-arm curve. As this interim look, at 184 deaths, most of those censored patients will have died, which will "normalize" the placebo curve and probably lower the hazard ratio even further. ANYTHING that relieves the worry about the 24 month death rate and shows improving hazard ratio beyond the .753 already seen, will vastly increase the chances of statistical significance at the final trial calculation. If the data is like this, but Mr. Market is disappointed, this could be the buy of a lifetime - with only a 18-24 month holding period until fruition. Heck - I went through this with Dendreon already from 2007 - 2009, and was rewarded with a $4 stock going to $25 (and currently $35, with a probable $40-45 in May).
Next post: more buy candidates, with the cash I now have in hand!
Regards,
Trond
On Friday, the Port had all 2000 ProGenics (PGNX) called away at $5, and the Elan calls expired worthless, allowing me to keep the premium and the shares. We're back to above 17% annualized return, still well shy of the 24 I am aiming for. I still feel it is doable, if I just put some time back into this Port. I have only been selling calls on 1 to 3 holdings a month, where I should be turning 100% of the holdings. I'll be selling the Genvec this coming week, since it does not offer options and I'm up over 10% already, having been in it for only a month. Time to take that profit and buy something I can sell calls against!
GenVec should be announcing the interim PACT trial results within 4 weeks now. On January 15th they said 10 to 12 weeks, and Friday 3/19/10 was exactly 9 weeks. While they may announce this coming week, both their annual earnings call and the recent Roth presentation suggested it could spill over into April so I would put more faith into it happening right around the first week of April.
In my real money IRA, I have an insane amount tied up in both Dendreon and Genvec - something like 85% of the total value. It has served me well, as the majority of Dendreon was bought under $6 (now $35) and my Genvec average basis is around $1.25 (now $2.80). I am however, finally at the point where I'll be selling at least a third of my GNVC over the next week or so, and may even dent my DNDN by 10% or so. I am far more confident that Dendreon will get approval, but at this price (mid 30s) I just do not see the return that I saw at the mid $20s we were at only a couple months ago. Genvec, at a little below $3, is also a MUCH different creature risk/return wise, than it was at the $0.77 I started buying at. The upcoming data release is a short term make-or-break event; it could go down (I honestly don't see it going below $1.50) on so-so data, but it could spike as much as another $7-10 on statistically significant data. There is a "reasonable" chance of stat-sig results - say 20-30% - but I am not risking 40+% of my net worth on a 20-30% chance of a home run. Please note that everyone's personal sense of risk vs. reward is vastly different - I AM in effect saying I'm okay with risking ~25% of my net worth!
This is because I already have a two bagger on Genvec - the most likely worse case scenario brings me back to a only slight average gain. I contrast this to the results, if excellent, and it makes sense for me to hold about 2/3 of what I have now, through the data release. For someone buying in now, it would be a greatly different risk/reward calculation.
Please also note that IF GenVec does drop, it very likely could be because the market is disappointed in the data not being excellent, and NOT because the data is bad. At the 92nd event - the first interim look) the hazard ratio was already .753 - the lower from 1.0 the better. This would have been a very good result, but investors were spooked because at 24 months, there was no apparent drug benefit. Missed was the fact that only three patients were still alive and uncensored, and one of those was in the placebo arm. Thus the placebo curve matched the drug-arm curve. As this interim look, at 184 deaths, most of those censored patients will have died, which will "normalize" the placebo curve and probably lower the hazard ratio even further. ANYTHING that relieves the worry about the 24 month death rate and shows improving hazard ratio beyond the .753 already seen, will vastly increase the chances of statistical significance at the final trial calculation. If the data is like this, but Mr. Market is disappointed, this could be the buy of a lifetime - with only a 18-24 month holding period until fruition. Heck - I went through this with Dendreon already from 2007 - 2009, and was rewarded with a $4 stock going to $25 (and currently $35, with a probable $40-45 in May).
Next post: more buy candidates, with the cash I now have in hand!
Regards,
Trond
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
