Thursday, August 27, 2009

Port24 update

Well, I had my AOB and MELA called away from me last Friday in the Port. I am sad at losing MELA as I expect it to gain quite a bit over the next couple months - it started Wednesday with a couple dollar spike. I ended up buying some back and selling the $10 strikes. Again, too early, as it is up over $10 today.

On Wednesday I sold 29 ARNA $6 Sept calls at $0.20. They have announced that the BLOSSOM trial results will come out in late September and I halfway expect these will be called away. If it is still under $6 in mid-Sept I will not be crying as I expect at least a 50% stock move on the results soon thereafter.

Yesterday I bought my MELA back at $9.50 and sold the Sept $10s for $0.45. The FDA will rule on MelaFind by December so these should be good for trading until the November series.

Finally, I also bought 1600 ALTH at $7.99... selling 8 Sept $7.50 calls and the other 8 Sept $10 calls. Allos has an advisory committee meeting on Sept 2 so the price should either be above $10 or back in the $6s.

So the Port now has the following holdings: (# calls sold against holding)
2000 NBIX
1600 ELN
1000 DNDN
2500 SGMO
400 BCRX
1000 MELA (10)
4900 ARNA (29)
200 AMAG
1600 ALTH (16)
Cash = $6,567...
... for a total worth of about $125,000. This is a 19.46 annualized return... still below my target of 24% but well above the market returns over a similar period (S&P and NASDAQ).
Note that I actually do not think either the S&P nor the NASDAQ is a correct index to compare the Port against, as I think of this as an absolute return fund. If I am not positive, I don't care if I beat the market by 100%.

Current favorites:
Look for ALTH to return ~30-50% in the next week.
ARNA is one of the best September covered call plays ever at the $5 strike. 10%+ return for less than a month with a large margin of safety.

Regards,
Trond

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Karl Denninger

Market-Ticker.org is one of my daily stops.
One of yesterday's posts, rendered to its core, is that overdraft fees, especially levied AT the ATM -- where the bank can obviously simply compare the amount being taken out versus the account balance and not allow the transaction -- are an intentional and unconscienable outrage.

Today may be a little over the top theatrically, but the outrage is genuine. I strongly urge the 3 or 4 minutes it might take to read it.

http://market-ticker.org/archives/1317-DAMNIT,-STOP-THE-LOOTING-NOW!.html

Regards,
Trond

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Marketocracy - top 100!

To those who don't know, Marketocracy com allows you to "manage" a mutual fund, having to follow strict diversification and cash management rules.

In the period ending June 30, 2009, I finally cracked the top 100 for the first time. In over two years, I have beaten the S&P 500 by 78%.

http://www.marketocracy.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Portfolio.woa/ps/FundPublicPage/source=CmOhHbFfEfOmLoNbMaKiAbDf

Yay me!

Regards,
Trond

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Port 24, Sangamo, and Elan

Made one trade today in the Port -- sold 4 Aug $12.50 calls against my BioCryst. 4 BIUHV at $0.75.

With the MELA, BCRX, and SGMO spikes, the Port is now at an 18.3% annualized return. I'm getting close to my projected 24%!

Sangamo has had a surprising few days of strength. I think unless there is news it'll fall back somewhat -- anything under $5.10 ($5.76 today) would be a very good buy.

Elan will hear soon about palperidone palmitate -- JNJ's schizo drug that the EDT division re-formulated and which is now in front of the FDA. An approval here will mean some significant royalties in the future, and I expect a nice 2-5% bump on that news.

Regards,
Trond

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

More Port 24 updates

Did a bunch at lunch today.
Sold the 6000 JAV for a 1 month 43% profit. It very well may keep going but I'm taking it off the table.
Bought 1800 AOB at $5 and sold the Aug $5 calls for $0.25. Around a 4% profit if over $5 in a month...
Sold 4 Aug $24 Dendreon calls for $0.90.
Bought 200 AMAG. Have not sold calls yet as I think it will go up in a couple weeks.

This is the current Port:
1800 AOB (18)
2000 NBIX
1600 ELN
1000 DNDN (4)
4900 ARNA (29)
2500 SGMO
400 BCRX
2000 MELA (20)
200 AMAG
$1980.36 cash
ann. = 10.62%

In my real IRA I also bought some AMAG today. I'll have to update my Favorite stocks!

Regards,
Trond

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

...and two more call positions... Port 24

Sold 4 Jul $27s of Dendreon at $0.64 each and 6 Jul $9s of Elan at $0.15.

Note the Elan calls are selling at 2% and if exercised would yield 27%+. This is EXACTLY the risk I'm looking for - getting my 2% a month with huge upside. The $8 calls are $0.30 which is a 4% monthly return, and probably are a smarter play. I actually do NOT want to lose my Elan shares which is why I elected to only sell 6 calls at the $9 strike.

Regards,
Trond

New buys in the Port 24

Bought 2000 MELA at $7.26, sold 20 AUG $7.50s for $0.70.
Bought 2900 ARNA at $4.70, sold 29 AUG $6 for $0.40.

Cash = $1,208.86 and positions are:

1600 AOB (16) (=calls written against)
2000 NBIX ()
1600 ELN ()
1000 DNDN ()
2500 SGMO ()
400 BCRX ()
2000 MELA (20)
6000 JAV ()
4900 ARNA (29)

ARNA, by the way, may be the safest 3 month play ever.

Regards,
Trond

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Port 24 update

Friday the 19th was June options expiration... and I lost 1000 Dendreon and 1000 BioCryst shares.

So the Port is now worth $109,753 (8.8% annualized return), with over $34,000 in cash. This is a good time to have loads of cash on hand, as I truly believe we will have another nasty market correction within a few months. My trick is now to find a couple SAFE places to invest this, earn a couple percent on covered calls, and be able to still have the principal ready when such correction occurs.

My first thought is oil -- I think we will see oil go to at least $90 a barrel by late July. So the exchange-traded fund USL is a possibility. It does not trade options, however, so if I want to get some covered calls I will need to go with USO (currently ~ $38/share). That works for me: selling the July $40s at about $0.90 (2%+) is probably the best play. We'll see what happens on Monday!

Regards,
Trond

Friday, June 19, 2009

Dendreon - title character at Deep Capture

"Then, on April 28, at 11:22 am — just hours before Dendreon’s triumph in Chicago – an anonymous message board author on Yahoo! Finance posted this message: “HIGH PROBABILITY OF MASSIVE BEAR RAID…DNDN [Dendreon] could easily drop 50% on a massive bear raid…its coming today@12:30 pm central.”
Just minutes before 12:30 pm central, Dendreon’s stock price began to fall. It didn’t just fall–it nosedived from $24 to under $8 … in 75 seconds. That’s correct, during a period of 75 seconds, more than 4,000 trades were placed, totaling 3 million shares, or about 50% of Dendreon’s (spectacularly high) average daily volume. Given that the message board poster knew what was coming, it is a safe bet that this was a coordinated, illegal naked short selling attack. And just in case you still didn’t get this – it caused Dendreon’s share price to lose more than 65% of its value – in just 75 seconds flat."
http://www.deepcapture.com/michael-milken-60000-deaths-and-the-story-of-dendreon-chapter-1-of-15/

Wow is all I can say. I know almost all of this from following the stock in the last 2 1/2 years, but it is an amazing story.

Regards,
Trond

Friday, June 5, 2009

Dendreon: "Riskless"?

When Dendreon received the FDA's Complete Response Letter in May 2007, there were two things that were said to be the reason for the non-approval of Provenge.

One was that they needed more clinical trial data; and the at-the-time ongoing IMPACT trial was going to fulfill that need.
The second was a Form 483 from the CMC section. Basically, something in the manufacturing part wasn't up to snuff.

In April we learned that the IMPACT trial succeeded, and wildly so. Unfortunately, the company was never very forthright on exactly what caused the Form 483. They said it was something that could be corrected; but as investors in Discovery Labs (DSCO) know, that is cold comfort: DSCO has now received THREE 483s and is still not approved.

Yesterday Deutche Bank upgraded Dendreon, saying their research indicated the 483 was for two main reasons: barcoding and documentation issues. If this is true, then these truly are easily fixed things and there would be NO remaining regulatory risks for Dendreon.

Regards,
Trond

Deutche:
We believe CMC issues will likely not delay FDA approval. There is some concern remaining CMC issues related to Provenge could delay approval. One investor concern is that there is risk to the Provenge manufacturing process, which could translate into a delay in FDA approval. This concern stems from the FDA’s 2007 complete response letter, in which additional information with respect to the chemistry manufacturing and controls (CMC) section of the BLA was requested.
Management believes it has addressed the issues brought up in the 483. While Dendreon expects it will have another inspection, the company does believe it has addressed the issues raised in the original 483 issued following a PAI (pre-approval inspection) in 2007. It has stated that it has kept the manufacturing facility in Morris Plains, NJ “PAI validated”, meaning that the company has been running it at lower levels so that it remains a validated class 100 space and meets a number of specifications. The company has also stated that it has had preliminary discussions with the agency on most of the 483 issues. Key issues described in the 483 related to bar-coding samples & documenting rules In our view, the issues raised in the 483 from the inspection that took place from February 12 to February 17 appear very mild. We believe the most important comment on the 483 was related to the request for more data on the handling of multiple samples in the same room as well as quality control steps used for maintaining the identity of the samples (i.e. bar codes).
The rest of the issues relate primarily to Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) documents that
basically describe various rules for certain procedures (the inspectors believed certain additions needed to be made in the documents). We believe that the issues raised in the 483 were likely easily addressed by the company, as in various conversations with management it has discussed using a bar-code system. A detailed list of issues raised in the 483 is available in the figure on the next page. In our opinion, there is likely little risk to manufacturing process for BLA approval
The manufacturing process and control systems for Provenge have been in place for many years and have been utilized during the clinical trial (over 1000 patient samples have been made in clinical trials). We believe the company has likely addressed any outstanding issues the FDA had in the original 483 because it has had time to do so and because the issues seem relatively easy to fix. Dendreon has had the advantage of having the FDA review its CMC section before and has had two years to implement any issues raised. What else gives us confidence? Many steps of the process are not unique to Provenge. The FDA has had experience managing patient-specific products such as diagnostic tests that have quality control measures in place that are similar to those for Provenge. The leukapheresis process is also well known by the FDA and many centers conduct the process on a daily basis for other procedures. Diagnostic testing frequently uses bar coding and quality assurance procedures to keep samples from getting mixed up. Finally, the antigen activation steps that take place at the NJ facility are not that complex, in our view. We believe the greatest challenge will be scaling up the process in time for launch and getting more physicians set up with infusion ability (to be discussed in a later section) Given patient awareness and lack of other therapies, we believe many patients will want Provenge. In addition to the ~30,000 new patients with metastatic disease every year, there are approximately ~70,000 existing metastatic patients who may want therapy. We believe the current plant will only provide for ~10,000 patients at peak and may only be able to supply ~2500 patients in the first 6-9 months of launch.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Port 24 update

Well that was quick.

I am back in the black ... BioCryst is on a tear and just about made up my shortfall all by its lonesome. I sold 5 more DNDN Jun $24 calls this morning, as well as selling all 3000 shares of my ARQL. Still love the stock, but it was up nearly 100% and the price is just too low under $5 to get significant option premium.
I turned around and bought 1600 AOB (at 4.72), and sold 16 Jul $5 for $0.35 which is 7% for a month and a half.

The port is now at $100,286 and my positions are:

1600 AOB (16)
2000 NBIX ()
1600 ELN ()
2000 DNDN (10)
2000 ARNA ()
2500 SGMO ()
1400 BCRX (14)

Regards,
Trond

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Port 24 and two picks

Sold 5 June $25 covered calls at $0.40 against Dendreon, and 4 June $5s at $0.25 against BioCryst.

I have two stock picks right now. One is safe, and one is for some bang.

Dendreon (I can't believe I am saying this!) is my safe pick. At $21 right now, it may go as low as $18 or so over the next couple months, but in terms of a one year time span, it will have a floor under it AND have significant upside. The chances of a partnership agreement, new trials, analyst day this summer, a Q4 filing of the Provenge BLA, and ultimately an approval next spring all will keep some excitement going and each of these should give the stock a boost.

Sangamo is the bang-for-the-buck stock. It has been drifting lower for a month now and is currently in the high $3s. They will be getting trial soon and are a constant threat to compile new partnership agreements at any time. Each of these may be for small dollar amounts (relatively) but at some point some analyst is going to say, "Wow, 20 or 30 $5-10M agreements really add up!" I want to be there for that lightening strike.

Regards,
Trond

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Port 24 update

Well, it has been exactly one year since I started the Portfolio 24.

It is a model portfolio starting with $100,000.00. I had expectations of making 2% a month, utilizing a covered call strategy. For the year, I fell well short of that, with the Port being worth $89,560 with today's prices. That is an actual 10.5% loss, or 34.5% below my desired return.

While I could use the overall miserable performace of the market (for example, the Nasdaq was down 32 percent and the S&P500 was negative 35% for that one-year period) as an excuse, I prefer to view this as an absolute return portfolio, not a relative. In other words, I do not want to simply beat the market returns, I want to ALSO always make money.

Three things hampered me.

1) Elan absolutely killed me; I bought 800 shares right before the disastrous duo of the ICAD presentation/PML cases. That is a $21,000 mistake at this moment, which would put me at a 10% gain on the year if I had not done that one purchase.

2) I neglected the Portfolio all fall and through the spring. I would have made "some" option premium if I'd been paying attention and selling some out-of-the-money calls. In no way would I have clawed back to even, but I probably left a minimum of $4,000 on the table.

3) I went away from the original strategy somewhat by stocking up on Elan and Dendreon. It worked quite well in Dendreon's case and not so well in Elan's. And it wasn't even the fact I was adding those two names in bulk; I refused to sell calls against them because I didn't want to be called away from perceived large gains.

I bought 1400 shares of BioCryst Pharma today at $2.47, and sold 10 June $2.50 calls for $0.50 -- a nice 20% premium for one month! I also sold 20 $22.50 May calls against Dendreon -- they expire tomorrow and with the stock at $20.90 I think it free money. Granted, the contracts were only $8 each but it came to $130 after commissions.

So right now, the Port stands at $89,566, with the following holdings:

3000 ARQL, 2000 NBIX, 1600 ELN, 2000 DNDN, 2000 ARNA, 2500 SGMO, and 1400 BCRX; $614 in cash. I have 20 Dendreon May calls sold and 10 BioCryst June calls sold. Next week after options expiration I will be more active!

Regards,
Trond

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Dendreon wins! SEC loses...

I cannot wait until I can retire with enough cash stored under my mattress.

But first! Dendreon presented the IMPACT data yesterday and it pretty much validated everything they said about Provenge. Longer survival. In a patient population where the average placebo life expectancy was 21.7 months, Provenge conferred an extra 4.1 months... nearly 20% longer life. And at the 3 year mark, 38% of Provenge patients were still alive versus only 21% of placebo.

In the 93 seconds before trading was halted before the data presentation, the share price was manipulated down from $25 to $7.50, closing before halt at $11 something! A lot of short-sellers managed to cover at a good price. Investing primarily in micro and small cap biotechs as I do, I wish I could say this was extra-ordinary but ... it isn't. The SEC needs to do it's job and stop this crap from happening.

It's a great day for prostate cancer patients. Congratulations to Dendreon!

Regards,
Trond

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Inflation?

Thanks to Ming, who basically asked, "If the Fed is printing all this money and buying $300B of t-bonds, then why don't we see inflation?"

Also thanks to the John Mauldin blog, which I read religiously at http://www.2000wave.com/gateway.asp. He tackled this same idea a week or so again and I am going to use the equation MV = PQ, which he reminded me of, to explain the answer.

M is the supply of money
V is the velocity of money [the speed at which it moves through the economy]
P is the price level [this is what we consider inflation or deflation as it moves up or down]
Q is basically GDP, or gross domestic product -- the quantity of what we produce

All else being equal, an increase in M should either decrease V, or increase either P or Q. The increase in P is usually what we encounter, as Q is hard to change short term and V isn't necessarily something affected by Fed actions.

In our case however, all else is NOT equal. V has slowed down dramatically -- banks aren't lending as much, either retail or commercial. Q has also dropped significantly -- cars and houses aren't being built, suppliers are afraid to make too much, etc.

Therefore, the increase in M is being more than offset by decreases in V and Q. So much so, in fact, that we'd have quite a severe case of deflation if the Fed had not taken action -- Mauldin argues that he expects to see much MORE Fed action just to keep us where we're at.

Regards,
Trond

Friday, April 17, 2009

Volatility, Dendreon, and Elan

Well let's tackle the day.

On my QQQQ volatility play a couple posts ago, I had bought 2 April $30 calls for $310 total and sold 3 April $31 puts for $350. Yesterday the calls would have been sold for $660, while the puts were worthless, and held for today in case the market tanks (which does not look like it will happen). So this play was an exact net gain of zero, taking commissions into account.

A couple notes on this. The 2x3 nature is an odd play. If it doubles to the calls, it may or may not be profitable. If it doubled to the puts, I would have had an easy 25% or more return. I only gave myself two weeks on this one, and typically I'd go for the "month out" expiration rather than the upcoming one. Finally, playing the QQQQ is probably a mistake, as there is QID and QLD; exchange traded funds which double the percentage returns of the QQQQ. So utilizing options, a double is more easily found.

Dendreon:
They will be presenting the IMPACT Provenge results at the American Urological Association meeting on April 28th. The CEO has said the results are "robust" and "unambiguous", so I have no doubt they easily cleared the 22% HR needed for statistical significance.

Elan:
Biogen announced earnings last night and said Tysabri growth was in line with expectations -- neither bad nor great. They now have about 39,800 patients worldwide -- if they are going to hit 100K patients by the end of 2010 then we really need a kickstart in the next couple quarters -- but it probably will not happen. Who cares? Slow and steady growth is fine for me -- and we are past the "blockbuster" status of $1B in sales now. Bring on 75K patients!

Regards,
Trond

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Dendreon passes with flying colors

Dendreon's IMPACT trial met "unambiguous" statistical significance.

That's enough for me... lots of details out there remain to be shown at the AUA meeting on 4/28, but they passed. They will resubmit the BLA in the fourth quarter - no other real news.

Congratulations to Dendreon, and to cancer patients. Bring on the pipeline!

Regards,
Trond

Friday, April 10, 2009

Updates - Dendreon and Elan

Well, I am going to cheat and basically cut & paste an email I just sent to a few folks:

Dendreon:

Here we go!! We’ll know the final results by the 28th at the latest. We’re at $6.30 now and it’ll be:
a repeat of 2007, going to $20 or so (on a statistically significant results)
bouncing around between $4 and $10 (if the results are very close to stat sig – they’ve indicated they will refile anyways, if this happens)
drop to $1 or so (if a large miss). I do not see this happening at all because 6 months ago the interim already showed a 20% reduction of risk of death from the drug – and they only need a 22% reduction at the final.

I personally think it’ll be a pretty good result. If we see $20+, you may want to sell half of what you have and let the rest stay for approval.


Elan:

Earnings call are coming up -- BIIB on the 16th and Elan on the 22nd. So we'll know Tysabri numbers. Last known is 37,100 worldwide at the end of 2008. I am actually unsure if this includes the 600 in trials or if it's only commercial? I suspect it is total, as all other reports show it that way.

IF we return to close to 200/week net adds, this would be about 2,400 new patients and put us just shy of 40K. So I view anything north of 40K as pretty spectacular. One thing to keep in mind is that the EU is pretty fragmented and each county has to approve Tysabri and the insurance costs individually. So uptake is slower but starts gathering steam a few quarters after each country finally approves it. We're close to snowballing territory, I think ... may be 1 or 2 more quarters though.

AAB-001 - probably no news. More details of how they are approaching the 2 mg dose of non-carriers that they dropped, but that is just noise. I don't expect anything until end of this year, IF they take an interim and it's good. Still remotely possible that they file a BLA at the end of the year based on the non-carrier phase II results and 6-9 months safety data from the III. I doubt this now, as the dropped 2 mg group was because of vascular edema. Too much safety noise and the 2.0 mg group taken out would be post-hoc. Bummer!

Sale of the company? Partial sale? I don't think they'd release that at an earnings call. I unfortunately still think we'll see a buyout before years end simply because the market cap is too attractive.

I bought more last week at $5.67. It may bounce around but I don’t think it’ll go lower than $4, and I think we’ll start seeing it go up again IF Tysabri numbers start increasing at an increasing rate again (which I view as likely).

Regards,
Trond

Saturday, April 4, 2009

Dendreon on the Move

Yesterday was kind of fun.

Dendreon was plodding along in the morning... somewhere around $4.30 or so. I was wondering if THIS would be the day that it might move another 20 or 30 cents upwards. We're IN April, and we are expected to get the final results of the IMPACT trial for Provenge sometime in April...

A little blurb appears, saying that Dendreon has a slot at the American Urological Association annual seminar on April 28, under a late-breaking news application. No big deal, right? That's by the end of April... no biggie, they'd announce a PR about results and then present at a major conference.

Half an hour later WHAM. The stock jumps to $5.20 and starts climbing -- about another dollar in 2 minutes. Kind of fun to refresh the screen and see the stock going up a dime every time you refresh. It was like in 2007, the day after the FDA's Advisory Committee met and voted that Provenge was safe by a 17-0 and substantially effective by a 13-4 margin. I'd refresh the screen then, and we were up a dollar!

We closed at 5.99. Again ... will we keep the gains? Keep going? Drop back? I have no clue. But as we get closer to the end of the month, expect more volatility! Me? I'm keeping most of my shares.

Regards,
Trond

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Elan and follow up to my volatility trade

Two things tonight:

Elan and Wyeth announced that they are dropping the 2 mg dose in the non-APOE4 gene carrier cohorts of the Alzheimer's Disease drug bapineuzimab (AAB-001), due to safey concerns relating to vasogenic edema. That was the minor brain swelling they encountered in the Phase II - more so in the carrier group than the non-carrier. They already had made the decision to not include that dosing group in the Phase III carrier group.

What this means is simply that those already dosed will continue in the trial and be randomized into the .5 or the 1 mg groups. This is not really news that should move the stock.

We had a pretty good move in the Nasdaq today ... it went from 30.77 to 31.76, or 3% That was enough to move the options as shown below (new prices are what you could sell the contracts for. If I closed out it would make some money, but not at my target, so it continues!

As an aside, I opened up a real time trade near the end of the day when the QQQQ was at $31.93 -- 3 each of the April $32 calls and puts. I will advise when I close out of this trade.

Strike Date . Strike Price . Type . Contract Price . Sell Price
April . . . . . $30 . . . . . . . . .Call . . . . . . . $150 . . . . . 238
April . . . . . .$31 . . . . . . . .. .Put . . . . . . .. $114 . . . .. 62
May . . . . . .$30 . .. . . . . . Call . . . .. . . .$216 . . . . 298
May . . . . . . .$31 . . . . . .. . . .Put . . . . .. . . $181 . . . . 131

IF I closed out of the April trades now, I would have gained 2*88 on the calls and lost 3*52 on the puts... with commissions it would be pretty much a wash. I really need a full doubling of the profit side to close out successfully. It is also obvious in retrospect that one should strive to made the two sides an equal number of calls vs. puts, as the calls need to gain a larger percentage to offset the 150% as many puts.
In the May series, there is a 2*82 gain and a 3*50 loss, again, nearly a wash. I will hold these.

Regards,
Trond